Add GPS pin definitions missed in revamp (#2834)

This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Bennett 2023-09-26 05:44:08 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent e96ba7cbcf
commit 04b2ab82dc
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
#define I2C_SCL 22
#define BUTTON_PIN 36 // The user button (information button) GPIO on the Nano G1 explorer
//#define BUTTON_PIN_ALT 13 // Alternate GPIO for an external button if needed. Does anyone use this? It is not documented
// anywhere.
// #define BUTTON_PIN_ALT 13 // Alternate GPIO for an external button if needed. Does anyone use this? It is not documented
// anywhere.
#define EXT_NOTIFY_OUT 13 // Default pin to use for Ext Notify Module.
// common pinout for their SX1262 vs RF95 modules - both can be enabled and we will probe at runtime for RF95 and if
@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
#define USE_RF95
#define USE_SX1262
#define GPS_RX_PIN 34
#define GPS_TX_PIN 12
#define LORA_DIO0 26 // a No connect on the SX1262 module
#define LORA_RESET 23
#define LORA_DIO1 33 // SX1262 IRQ

View File

@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
#define I2C_SCL 22
#define BUTTON_PIN 36 // The middle button GPIO on the Nano G1
//#define BUTTON_PIN_ALT 13 // Alternate GPIO for an external button if needed. Does anyone use this? It is not documented
// anywhere.
// #define BUTTON_PIN_ALT 13 // Alternate GPIO for an external button if needed. Does anyone use this? It is not documented
// anywhere.
#define EXT_NOTIFY_OUT 13 // Default pin to use for Ext Notify Module.
// common pinout for their SX1262 vs RF95 modules - both can be enabled and we will probe at runtime for RF95 and if
@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
#define USE_RF95
#define USE_SX1262
#define GPS_RX_PIN 34
#define GPS_TX_PIN 12
#define LORA_DIO0 26 // a No connect on the SX1262 module
#define LORA_RESET 23
#define LORA_DIO1 33 // SX1262 IRQ
@ -30,4 +33,4 @@
#endif
// different screen
#define USE_SH1106
#define USE_SH1106