2020-02-03 17:13:19 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <Arduino.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "mesh-pb-constants.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "MeshTypes.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class NodeDB {
|
|
|
|
// NodeNum provisionalNodeNum; // if we are trying to find a node num this is our current attempt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NodeNum ourNodeNum; // -1 if not yet found
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// A NodeInfo for every node we've seen
|
|
|
|
// Eventually use a smarter datastructure
|
|
|
|
// HashMap<NodeNum, NodeInfo> nodes;
|
|
|
|
NodeInfo nodes[MAX_NUM_NODES];
|
|
|
|
int numNodes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool updateGUI; // we think the gui should definitely be redrawn
|
|
|
|
NodeInfo *updateGUIforNode; // if currently showing this node, we think you should update the GUI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
/// don't do mesh based algoritm for node id assignment (initially)
|
|
|
|
/// instead just store in flash - possibly even in the initial alpha release do this hack
|
|
|
|
NodeDB();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// given a subpacket sniffed from the network, update our DB state
|
|
|
|
/// we updateGUI and updateGUIforNode if we think our this change is big enough for a redraw
|
|
|
|
void updateFrom(const MeshPacket &p);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NodeNum getNodeNum() { return ourNodeNum; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// if returns false, that means our node should send a DenyNodeNum response. If true, we think the number is okay for use
|
|
|
|
// bool handleWantNodeNum(NodeNum n);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* void handleDenyNodeNum(NodeNum FIXME read mesh proto docs, perhaps picking a random node num is not a great idea
|
|
|
|
and instead we should use a special 'im unconfigured node number' and include our desired node number in the wantnum message. the
|
|
|
|
unconfigured node num would only be used while initially joining the mesh so low odds of conflicting (especially if we randomly select
|
|
|
|
from a small number of nodenums which can be used temporarily for this operation). figure out what the lower level
|
|
|
|
mesh sw does if it does conflict? would it be better for people who are replying with denynode num to just broadcast their denial?)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
/// Find a node in our DB, return null for missing
|
|
|
|
NodeInfo *getNode(NodeNum n);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Find a node in our DB, create an empty NodeInfo if missing
|
|
|
|
NodeInfo *getOrCreateNode(NodeNum n);
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern NodeDB nodeDB;
|
2020-02-03 19:15:17 +00:00
|
|
|
extern MyNodeInfo myNodeInfo;
|
2020-02-03 19:53:38 +00:00
|
|
|
extern User owner;
|